In residence · Kinis House

Real smoothing. Still you.

Proof & Results Lab

Evidence, honestly kept.

Tester cohorts, observation plans, before-and-after governance and a claims matrix — so the launch stands on real proof, not overreach.

Cohort tracker

Real testers, structured feedback

TesterCohortPatchWearComfortAdhesionRemovalVisibleConsentNotes
Nadia R.
47 · Static forehead line, side sleeper
7-nightForehead7h 20m avg5/55/54/54/5
Yes
‘Barely felt it. Line looked softer by night 5.’
Priya S.
39 · Smile-line depth pre-event
1-nightSmile line8h4/55/55/53/5
Yes
‘Wore before a shoot. Skin looked smoother in the morning.’
Elena M.
54 · Perimenopausal, dryness, deep smile lines
28-dayBoth7h4/54/54/54/5
Yes
‘By week three, my skincare seemed to work harder.’

Observation plan

1-night cohort

  • Baseline capture: same lens, daylight, neutral expression.
  • Skincare applied and fully absorbed before patch.
  • Wear window logged (hours). Removal notes captured.
  • Morning capture within 30 min of removal.
  • Comfort / adhesion / removal / visible change scored 0–5.

Observation plan

7-night cohort

  • Baseline capture: same lens, daylight, neutral expression.
  • Skincare applied and fully absorbed before patch.
  • Wear window logged (hours). Removal notes captured.
  • Nightly logs. Cumulative photo on night 7.
  • Comfort / adhesion / removal / visible change scored 0–5.

Observation plan

28-day cohort

  • Baseline capture: same lens, daylight, neutral expression.
  • Skincare applied and fully absorbed before patch.
  • Wear window logged (hours). Removal notes captured.
  • Weekly photo + written diary. Optional dermatology-adjacent review.
  • Comfort / adhesion / removal / visible change scored 0–5.

Before-and-after governance

Same conditions, or it doesn't count.

  • Same lens and camera settings across nights
  • Same natural daylight or same lamp, same distance
  • Same distance, same angle, same expression (neutral)
  • Skincare applied and absorbed for the same time before capture
  • No retouching that changes result (dust/hair removal only)
  • Signed consent + right to withdraw on file
  • Photograph date and cohort night labelled in filename

UK cosmetics compliance

What we do not say.

  • Avoid medical claims (‘treats’, ‘cures’, ‘repairs’).
  • Avoid permanent-result claims (‘erases’, ‘eliminates for good’).
  • Avoid Botox-equivalence claims (‘the new Botox’, ‘Botox in a patch’).
  • Avoid guaranteed outcomes (‘will work’, ‘guaranteed results’).
  • Avoid unsupported numerical claims without cited evidence.
  • This workflow is an internal governance tool, not legal advice.

Claims matrix

Every claim, its evidence, its wording

Proposed claim

Softens the appearance of static forehead lines overnight

Evidence · In-house 7-night wear trial, n=12 (interim)

Owner · Trisya O'Brien

Acceptable

Softens the appearance • Visibly smoother-looking

Prohibited

Erases wrinkles • Botox alternative • Permanent results

Proposed claim

Comfortable enough for side sleepers

Evidence · Tester adhesion + comfort scores (avg 4.5/5)

Owner · Trisya O'Brien

Acceptable

Designed for overnight wear • Stays put on all sleep positions

Prohibited

Guaranteed to stay on • Medical-grade

Proposed claim

Non-invasive smoothing ritual

Evidence · Product category definition, cosmetic-grade adhesive

Owner · Trisya O'Brien

Acceptable

Non-invasive cosmetic ritual • Temporary cosmetic effect

Prohibited

Medical device • Treatment

Audit-ready proof vault

Upload evidence, linked to every claim

Sign in to upload and review proof documents. The audit trail is private to the Kinis House team.